by
David Raney
Call
me male-ish. According to cultural assumptions, men are supposed to like guns,
but I’m not really a gun guy. As a boy I wheedled a BB gun for Christmas with
the solemn vow not to shoot birds, which I did at the first opportunity.
“You’ll shoot your eye out” runs the refrain from the movie Christmas
Story, and at least I didn’t do that. But I shot out a bird’s. Stalking the
wild sparrow in our back yard, I missed innumerable times before chance brought
down a luckless thing from our birch tree, a bead of blood vividly welling
where its eye had been. I stood over it dumbfounded until a rap at the picture
window startled me and I saw my brother pointing in the dramatic full-body pose
we now refer to as J’Accuse! before running off to find my
mother and bring down justice. It didn’t surprise me when I later read that the
last wild passenger pigeon, out of billions darkening pre-1900 American skies,
was killed in Ohio by a boy with a BB gun.
Men
are fascinated by cars, too, I’m told, and football and fixing things, and
we’re competitive sexbots, comparing conquests and notching headboards. I don’t
really qualify as “manly” on those counts either, though I can be adolescently
competitive in the sports I care about. But testosterone levels aside, here’s
my question: Is it possible to connect with people first as humans, and only
afterward as men and women? Unless we’ve taken monastic vows, we interact with
each other all day, at work and play and school, shopping, dating. But
sometimes it seems less interacting than circling: shy, cocky, avid, wary,
desperate for attention, wishing we were invisible.
I’ve
been interested in this terra incognita for the better part of
my life, as we all have, but lately I’ve been thinking about a certain
backwater of the territory that used to be called wolf whistling or catcalling,
and now in our less poetic times is referred to as “street harassment.” Consigned
by cliché to certain neighborhoods, particularly to wharves and construction
sites, it’s been treated for generations as a behavioral imperative issued with
the sailor suit and hardhat.
Is
it a behavioral imperative though? Whether sexual attitudes and behavior owe
more to biology or culture, a debate that’s far from over, this isn’t 1965
after all. Surely gross misogyny is on the wane, like smoking, if only from the
pressure of broad social disapproval. Even the word “catcalling” sounds like a Mad
Men plot point. But it hasn’t gone away, of course, as half-open eyes
and ears will tell you.
I
react to women, and if I were homosexual, I’d react to men. That’s a biological
imperative, not a behavioral one. No one, I think, wants us to stop noticing
each other. I just don’t react like the wolf in Red Hot Riding Hood.
I’ve never offered a public assessment of a woman’s body or suggested to a
stranger what a fool she’d be not to avail herself of my outsized charms. This
makes me a paragon of nothing, as I don’t imagine my friends do it either. I
know my father didn’t. In any case, who does it is less interesting to me than
why, and what it feels like. So I started asking women.
The
problem was how to approach someone at a bus stop or coffee shop without
sounding like the saddest pickup artist ever. (“’Scuse me, just wondering, do
guys hit on you all the time?”) But I wanted to hear from more than friends or
the internet — where, as you’d expect, treatments range from intellectual to
comic to incendiary — so at the risk of being slapped or simply ignored, I ask.
What
works best, after establishing that I’m a writer, is to ask women if they’ve
lived somewhere else and noticed any differences in catcalling. I realize this
begs the question, but no one has ever corrected me. Precisely zero women said
they’d never been whistled at or otherwise harassed in public. My unscientific
survey suggests it happens nearly everywhere, to pretty much all women,
regardless of age, attire or weather.
Researchers
have done some work in this field, though I was surprised to find how little of
that research occurred until recently. The CDC reported in 2010 that worldwide seventy
to ninety-nine percent of women experienced “non-contact unwanted sexual
experiences.” In a 2008 study by StopStreetHarassment.com, nearly ninety
percent of women said they’d experienced harassment by age nineteen, almost a
quarter by age twelve. Twelve. Americans, incidentally, have no
special claim on this ugly street theater: in one study more than eighty
percent of women in both Egypt and Canada reported harassment, and in Yemen,
where women typically go about modestly dressed or veiled, the figure is over ninety
percent.
The
women who have been kind enough to talk to me about their own experiences confirm
these findings, as well as the appalling range of misbehavior that can
accompany the hooting, whistling, and verbal vivisection. One woman was biking
along a country road between grocery store and home when a man pulled up next
to her, masturbating, then turned around and drove past again, clearly enjoying
her fear. The women with whom I’ve spoken say this sort of thing started when
they were eleven, twelve, fourteen, describing plenty of “Hey babys” and all
manner of unwanted advances. One woman wrote, “It’s hard to explain how
invasive it feels. I’ve had my entire house robbed twice, and it doesn’t even
approach that hit-and-run feeling. It makes you wary; you shut down.”
Men,
none of this will be news to your friend, girlfriend, daughter, sister, wife.
But it was to me, and the more I listened, the more troubling it got.
“Strangely enough,” one woman told me, “the college towns I grew up in were the
worst, whereas during five years in Philadelphia, I can only recall one stray
comment yelled from a car.” Others spoke differently of Philly, Atlanta,
Chicago and every other city I heard about, with two women saying the opposite
about college towns.
I’ve
spent a good part of my life in university settings, and I think the reason I
haven’t seen much of the cat or wolf isn’t that everyone’s so proper; I just
haven’t seen it. I’m not the recipient, for one thing, but apparently, I’m also
oblivious. As I spoke with women, I was shocked at how ubiquitous such
harassment is on campuses where I’ve worked. One woman told me she was
repeatedly harassed by a university security guard; another filed a report on
campus workers for leering at undergraduates. And it isn’t only nineteen-year-olds
in shorts; a middle-aged woman told me she’d been catcalled near the school
while walking in the rain in a bulky raincoat, oversized hat, and umbrella: “I
might as well have been wearing a tent.” And then there’s frat-boy behavior, an
example being the section of Brown’s campus that a woman told me she avoided
because it was known for rows of guys holding score cards, like Olympic judges,
as women walked by.
I’m
not alone in my density. The discussion “How common is catcalling?” on the site
Democratic Underground begins with a woman’s six-month diary of strangers
leering, making passes, and offering offensive comments regardless of weather
or dress. A sympathetic reader commented, “Being male, this is not in the realm
of my experience—neither as a receiver or a perp. Though I have witnessed
catcalling of women on the street, it's not all that common in my
neighborhood.” Possibly, but I’m willing to bet it’s more common than his
experience would suggest.
What
we dismiss in our density is the recognition that such behavior fosters fear in
women. Not only are catcalls demeaning, reducing the individual and complete
woman to a fraction of herself as a sexual object, when men leer and make
suggestive comments, they see women only through male eyes. Few men have
experienced how frequently unwanted advances escalate. Women are rightfully
afraid of being pawed, stalked, or attacked, however innocuous men might find
the leer or whistle. “Almost all women have a defensive strategy for walking
alone,” writes Jamie Golden in “Why Just Telling Men No Doesn’t Necessarily
Work,” but “almost no men do.” This seems to be true across cultures. “A
young woman likes to feel attractive,” one woman told me, “but I think women of
all ages feel that implicit threat of physical peril, always.”
Many
men, I’m sure, would regard the fear induced by unwanted advances as ludicrous.
Most women, I’m equally sure, would find it commonplace. Two women in a single
week of October 2015 were murdered after refusing to talk or give their phone
number to a man. One was in Detroit, at a funeral of all things, the other on a
street in Queens. Margaret Atwood writes that she once asked a male friend why
men feel threatened by women. He told her, “They’re afraid women will laugh at
them.” She asked a group of women the same question and they said, “We’re
afraid of being killed.”
The
wolf’s defense is typically to claim that a whistle or call is a compliment.
Deep down women like it; why the fuss? Innumerable articles and blog posts
argue against this, their titles sufficient: “No, Dudes, It’s Not Flattering”;
“Your Catcalls Are Not a Compliment. Ever.” Even Playboy weighed
in with a flowchart called “Dudes, It’s Not Flattering”, which concludes
that precisely two circumstances make catcalling acceptable: “1) You’ve
consensually agreed to shout sexually suggestive comments to each other in
public; 2) She is literally a cat.”
Yet
in 2014 New York Post writer Doree Lewak caused a stir
with an article titled “Hey ladies! Catcalls are flattering! Deal with it” in
which she maintains that she loves all the attention from construction crews:
"I’ll never forget my first time… I was over the moon…. The mystique
and machismo of manly construction workers have always made my heart beat a
little faster—and made my sashay a little saucier. It’s as primal as it
gets."
Never
mind that, as Lauren Bans noted in GQ, Lewak’s editorial “reads
like a drunk Carrie Bradshaw after a partial lobotomy.” The point Lewak chooses
to ignore is that she’s decided to be pleased by a situation that might turn to
violence, and frequently does. It’s not everyone’s option to disregard that
fact, nor her place to instruct them how to feel.
This
is why when male celebrities complain of being objectified (Robert Redford:
“People have been so busy relating to how I look, it's a miracle I didn't
become a self-conscious blob of protoplasm”), it’s possible to think they’re
sincere without accepting that they really know what they’re talking about. Any
fear they associate with the experience involves being professionally
trivialized, not made to hate half of humanity for the rest of your life.
It’s
why I’ll never really know what I’m talking about, either. In my only example
of trading perspectives, I was biking one day and stopped for a water break. A
van of teenagers rolled by, and one girl leaned out the window and whooped
something about my butt in bike shorts, pretending to be enthused for the
benefit of the guy driving and, I’m sure, for her own amusement. It wasn’t
about me—any male fifteen to fifty would have served—and there was no physical
threat. But it didn’t feel great, because that’s what objectification is: being
rendered interchangeable, a category.
The
other reflexive defense of this behavior is that it’s timeless, ineradicable,
it’s in our DNA. You hear this from men interviewed in the street, including
one who let this drop (along with my jaw) in a video: “I understand, you know—I
have five sisters. But it’s just, like, a societal thing. It’s the way things
roll.” To appeal to someone’s mother or sister might seem a foolproof way to
humanize the encounter. (Would you want someone to talk to your daughter that
way?) But isn’t that also objectifying, to say a woman is worthy of respect
because she’s somebody’s something?
The
behavior is certainly old, so I guess the excuses have to be. References to
whistling at women date to at least 200 B.C., when the Roman playwright Plautus
mentions a young woman who, "when she passes through the streets, all
the men would look at her, leer, nod and wink and whistle." He has a
father say this to his son, creepily enough, about a slave girl they both
covet. But old isn’t the same as natural—and what does that matter anyway?
We tamp down or prohibit all kinds of things that are arguably natural.
Evolutionarily speaking, indiscriminate rape is an efficient way to spread
one’s genes. Civilized people don’t practice it. And there’s the slippery slope
problem: assaults and rape are worse than whistling, but are they categorically
different or just on a continuum? If whistling is hard-wired, as some would
have it, and thus a cousin of “real” violence, wouldn’t rape be just as hard to
eradicate, just as exempt from the attempt?
I
hope not, because I enjoy connecting with people, not objects or opposites.
Maybe I’m fooling myself and a sexual agenda lurks under all our veneers. But
maybe not. I like giving directions to strangers, though I’m awful at it, and I
even like seeing other people do it—both looking the same direction, arms
outstretched like an invitation to dance. And I like eyes. While I can’t look
at the world through someone else’s, I can look into them, and what I see there
often saddens me.
Girls
are taught early not to talk to strange men, not to make eye contact. That’s
what I see in women’s eyes when they’re alone. Asked what she does to protect
herself from street harassment, a woman in Jessica Williams’s Late
Show segment on catcalling replies, “My normal response is to put on
my bitch face.” The other women nod. I pass them on the sidewalk, morning and
evening, walking and running, in suits and dresses and gym clothes. Their eyes
say I’ve heard it before, asshole, or Go
ahead and look—I’m not even here.
Those
expressions aren’t haughty, just defensive or middle-distance vacant, born of
long practice deflecting all the muttered invitations and “Damn, girls.”
Instead of thinking about the spring air or a project at work or a drink with
friends, she's spending mental energy sorting men into a box (guys, jerks) like
the one she's been in since middle school (tits, ass). Wouldn’t it be nice to
imagine a brighter world to breathe in, one where our fleeting chance of
connection didn’t come so freighted with fear?
I’ll
never know exactly what another person thinks or feels. I’m not even sure how
well I understand myself. But half a life later, I know what that sparrow saw.
David
Raney is a writer and editor in Atlanta. His pieces have
appeared in several dozen journals, books and newspapers. The latest good
fortune was being listed in Best American Essays 2018 and 2019.
Nice post
ReplyDeletesex dolls have become a new subject for research in market, where some says it would bring down sexual crimes, or crimes against child, but something we have to understands is that, sex dolls does not have the power to change your thoughts, in fact use of love dolls will make it more intense and wild and increasing objectification.
ReplyDelete